Ampullary Carcinoma
A rare malignant
tumor originating at the ampulla of Vater, in the last centimeter of the common
bile duct, where it passes through the wall of the duodenum and ampullary
papilla.
Signs
and symptoms
1.
Secondary
to biliary obstruction:
a. Pancreatitis
(May be the first clinical manifestation, due to obstruction of the pancreatic
duct)
b. Jaundice
(most common clinical presentation)
c. Pruritus
d. Courvoisier
gallbladder (ie, a distended, palpable gallbladder in a patient with jaundice)
*Courvoisier sign or Courvoisier-Terrier's
sign states that in a patient with painless jaundice and an enlarged
gallbladder (or right upper quadrant mass), the cause is unlikely to be
gallstones and therefore presumes the cause to be an obstructing pancreatic or
biliary neoplasm until proven otherwise.
2.
Diarrhea,
Weight loss, Malaise
3.
Abdominal
pain
4.
Dyspepsia,
Anorexia
5.
Nausea,
Vomiting
6.
Fever/chills
*particularly when the biliary tract has been explored previously (eg, after common duct exploration for stones, or after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]).
*particularly when the biliary tract has been explored previously (eg, after common duct exploration for stones, or after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]).
7.
Upper GI
bleed & heme positive stools, may occur due to ulceration of ampullary mass
(less common)
Pathophysiology
1 of 4 epithelial
types:
(1) terminal common bile duct
(2) duodenal mucosa
(3) pancreatic duct
(4) ampulla of Vater
Each type of mucosa produces a different
pattern of mucus secretion.
Ampullary tumors secreting sialomucins had
a better prognosis (100% vs 27% 5-y survival rate)
The 5-year survival rates were markedly
different between tumors that expressed CA 19-9 and those that did not (36% vs
100%)
Immunohistochemical stains for expressions
of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, Ki-67, and
p53 have been studied for prognostic power.
Epidemiology
relatively
uncommon tumor that accounts for approximately 0.2% of gastrointestinal tract
malignancies and approximately 7% of all periampullary carcinomas
Diagnostic
Considerations
Carcinoids
Neuroendocrine tumors
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)
Lipomas
Adenomyomatosis
Differential
Diagnoses
Bile Duct Strictures
Bile Duct Tumors
Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater
Cholangiocarcinoma
Gallbladder Cancer
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Pancreatic Cancer
Laboratory
Studies
1.
Complete
blood cell count
2.
Electrolyte
panel
3.
Liver
function studies
a. prothrombin
time
b. bilirubin
[direct and indirect]
c. transaminases
d. alkaline
phosphatase)
4.
Cancer
antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9)
*elevated in pancreatic malignancies
*elevated in pancreatic malignancies
5.
Carcinoembryonic
antigen (CEA)
* elevated in patients with other gastrointestinal malignancies (in particular, colon and rectal cancer), the possibility of a second primary tumor
* elevated in patients with other gastrointestinal malignancies (in particular, colon and rectal cancer), the possibility of a second primary tumor
Imaging
Studies
Ultrasonography
1.
initial
study to evaluate the common bile duct or pancreatic ducts
2.
Both
ultrasound and CT can help reveal metastatic disease in the liver or regional
lymph nodes
Computed tomography
1.
demonstrates
a mass but is not helpful in differentiating ampullary carcinoma from tumors of
the head of the pancreas or periampullary region.
2.
If the
lesion is smaller than 2 cm, pancreatic or bile duct dilation might be the only
abnormalities noted on CT scan
Endoscopic ultrasound
1.
biopsy
of the tumor via fine needle aspiration (FNA)
2.
for
lymph node metastasis (evaluate regional lymph nodes)
3.
for
vascular invasion (celiac and superior mesenteric vessels to evaluate)
Endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography
May suggest dx:
a.
Irregular
pancreatic duct narrowing
b.
Displacement
of the main pancreatic duct
c.
Destruction
or displacement of the side branches of the duct
d.
Pooling
of contrast material in necrotic areas of tumor
Positron emission tomography
a means of imaging the metabolic activity
of a particular tumor.
Staging
The classification
system of Yamaguchi and Enjoji is similar to the Martin classification:
Stage I
|
Vegetating tumor
limited to the epithelium with no involvement of the sphincter of Oddi
|
Stage II
|
Tumor localized
in the duodenal submucosa without involvement of the duodenal muscularis
propria but possible involvement of the sphincter of Oddi
|
Stage III
|
Tumor of the
duodenal muscularis propria
|
Stage IV
|
Tumor of the
periduodenal area or pancreas, with proximal or distal lymph node involvement
|
American Joint
Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition)
|
Primary tumor is defined as follows:
TX – Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 – No evidence of primary tumor
Tis – Carcinoma in situ
T1 – Tumor limited to ampulla of Vater or sphincter of Oddi
T2 – Tumor invades duodenal wall
T3 – Tumor invades pancreas
T4 – Tumor invades peripancreatic soft tissues or other organs
Regional lymph nodes are defined as
follows:
NX – Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0 – No regional lymph node metastases
N1 – Regional lymph node metastases (peripancreatic lymph node metastasis,
including lymph nodes along the hepatic artery and portal vein)
Distant metastases are defined as
follows:
MX – Presence of distant metastases cannot be assessed
M0 – No distant metastases
M1 – Distant metastases
|
Surgical
Care
pancreaticoduodenal
resection (Whipple procedure):
1.
The
gastric antrum and duodenum
2.
A
segment of the first portion of the jejunum, gallbladder, and distal common
bile duct
3.
The
head and often the neck of the pancreas
4.
Adjacent
regional lymph nodes
Factors associated
with the presence of lymph node metastasis included the following:
1.
Tumor
size ≥1 cm
2.
Poor
histologic grade
3.
Perineural
invasion, Microscopic vessel invasion
4.
Depth
of invasion > pT1
5.
T
stage (T1, 28.0%; T2, 50.9%; T3, 71.7%; T4, 77.3%; P < 0.001)
*5-year survival rates have ranged from
20-61%, averaging higher than 35%
Reference: Medscope
留言
張貼留言